One of my favourite magazines, The Futurist Magazine (July-August 2008), has an interesting article (“The 21st-Century Writer“) as the cover story. I was fascinated by this examination of knowledge media and its impact on the publishing industry. The article was reporting on a conference in February — in midtown Manhattan — publishing magnate and tech guru Tim O’Reilly’s “Tools of Change†conference.
One thing caught my eye, in particular — a quote from Stephen Abram, a past president of the Canadian Library Association, who said …
(we) need to “stop telling and start listening, to start working from the reader’s, the user ’s, the experiencer ’s contact in. Then they can start creating the products that actually match the behaviors of their user base. In many markets, the traditional publishing formats are misaligned with what needs to happen.â€Â
The reading of static text is a poor substitute for a visceral experience and always has been, said Abram. Plain text sufficed because there was no alternative, no superior way to convey complex data. That’s changed. Abram argued that it’s up to publishers to pick among the available media tools—including video clips, audio files, even virtual reality—and pull them together into a package that facilitates learning, not just reading.
“Do you want your cardiac surgeon to walk into your room before he does your surgery and say, ‘I read the article last night’? No, you want him to have had a thousand experiences putting his hand in someone’s chest and know what it feels like. It should be just like an experience a car mechanic has where he can put his hand on the hood of your car and say it’s the manifold because he’s seen it, heard it, smelled it a thousand times.â€Â
What fascinates me with this line of thinking is how it related to the development of expertise (central to my PhD research) and also how this ties to the use of knowledge media to disseminate and acculturate knowledge. Another area of interest for me is Participatory Design (or User-Centered Design). Stephen introduces the notion (inadvertently) of user centered publishing — an interesting framing of the opportunity. Congrats, Stephen! And thanks for these insightful comments from which I will derive many useful quotes.
· Permalink
“Plain text sufficed because there was no alternative, no superior way to convey complex data.”
Yet the idea is conveyed in plain text.
I think alternative forms of media are complementary to plain text, but there’s still value in something that can be read (and easily read offline, or printed, or copied and pasted (like you quoted), etc…).
Links go a long way in making plain text less plain.
· Permalink
Text is the way we communicate in western civilization – yes, probably the best we have, but graphics and video afford us an opportunity for a richer / high-bandwidth experience. Note as well, earlier humans used more graphical means (hieroglyphics and the paintings on cave walls).